All Posts

How International Issuers can Evaluate Dual Listings, Up-Listings and Jurisdiction Strategy Across US & Canadian Markets. This edition builds directly on that framework by addressing the next strategic question confronting boards and executive teams once readiness and pathway have been considered: which jurisdiction should we choose – and in what sequence – to maximize long-term capital-markets success?

Companies evaluating public markets are often presented with multiple options: a traditional IPO, a Regulation A offering, a reverse merger, a SPAC transaction, or a Canadian exchange listing. Each of these is a listing pathway - a distinct regulatory and transactional route to becoming a public company - and each carries very different implications for governance, cost, timeline, investor base, and long-term credibility. This article introduces a stage-based IPO readiness an

Explore a strategic guide to NASDAQ, NYSE, TSX, TSXV, OTCQX, SPACs, CPCs & reverse mergers for your Initial Public Offering & stock exchange listing requirements. Many companies mistakenly believe that going public involves simply selecting a stock exchange & raising capital through an IPO. In reality, major markets like NASDAQ, NYSE, TSX, TSXV, OTCQX, SPACs & CPCs differ significantly in key areas that impact IPO process, listing requirements & long-term success, ie: ...

Recent analyses indicate a rebounding IPO environment, with technology and AI-related issuers leading activity and delivering strong aftermarket performance. High-quality companies demonstrating clear profitability paths, risk management and strategic clarity are attracting capital, while under-prepared offerings face scrutiny, delays and loss of investor confidence. For U.S. and Canadian listings, regulators (SEC and CSA) continue to deepen reviews of emerging risks, ie c

Nasdaq has signaled a decisive shift in how it intends to evaluate small-cap companies seeking to list. In its newly proposed rule change, the exchange is seeking enhanced discretionary power to deny listings - even when a company meets all current quantitative requirements. The objective is straightforward: strengthen investor protections, clamp down on manipulation risks, and increase confidence in small-cap issuers. For companies planning a capital markets event in 2026 an

Good governance, is not just for public companies - it's also essential for small businesses, nonprofits - and for any organization that wants to improve performance, scale / grow, win contracts or grants, reduce risk, or raise investment. Given how important good governance is, Executive Agility is proud to launch our new Governance Benchmarking Service - an organizational-level assessment that provides clarity, control, and a roadmap for implementing better governance in yo

Preparing for an IPO is not just a financial milestone - it’s a governance transformation. Companies often assume that the biggest challenges lie in financial reporting or underwriting. In reality, weak corporate governance is often the cause of IPO delays and the biggest obstacle to a smooth, successful IPO. Regardless of where you list (ie: U.S. or Canada) an organization's governance maturity determines the following aspects related to IPO listing success:

Across the U.S. and Canada, many companies are making difficult yet essential decisions to restructure - not only in response to shifting markets, but to reposition for growth, innovation and long-term sustainability. Whether driven by changing economic conditions, evolving customer demands, or a new strategic direction, restructuring can be a powerful opportunity to redefine direction, realign resources and renew momentum - if managed well. At Executive Agility, we believe t

From Private to Public-Ready: How Executive Agility Accelerates IPO Readiness. We embed leadership, manage complexity, and assemble an IPO-ready team so you can list with confidence — fast, smooth and cost-effectively. Preparing for an IPO is not just a regulatory exercise — it’s a full-scale business transformation. Governance, financial discipline, culture, controls and investor transparency must all evolve together. Many companies underestimate the scope coordination requ

While GAAP mapping, quarterly close cadence and SOX readiness are distinct elements, they are interconnected and collectively enhance a company's overall governance framework...