Companies evaluating public markets are often presented with multiple options: a traditional IPO, a Regulation A offering, a reverse merger, a SPAC transaction, or a Canadian exchange listing. Each of these is a listing pathway - a distinct regulatory and transactional route to becoming a public company - and each carries very different implications for governance, cost, timeline, investor base, and long-term credibility. This article introduces a stage-based IPO readiness an

Recent analyses indicate a rebounding IPO environment, with technology and AI-related issuers leading activity and delivering strong aftermarket performance. High-quality companies demonstrating clear profitability paths, risk management and strategic clarity are attracting capital, while under-prepared offerings face scrutiny, delays and loss of investor confidence. For U.S. and Canadian listings, regulators (SEC and CSA) continue to deepen reviews of emerging risks, ie c

Preparing for an IPO is not just a financial milestone - it’s a governance transformation. Companies often assume that the biggest challenges lie in financial reporting or underwriting. In reality, weak corporate governance is often the cause of IPO delays and the biggest obstacle to a smooth, successful IPO. Regardless of where you list (ie: U.S. or Canada) an organization's governance maturity determines the following aspects related to IPO listing success: